![]()
A New Civilizationby Sarah van GelderOne of the articles in Generation NExT (IC#43)
Can our civilization evolve to meet these challenges, or are we too stuck in old patterns of thinking and living? What might "arise from the rubble?" Former Soviet President Mikhail Gorbachev brought together an extraordinary group of world leaders, scientists, musicians, spiritual leaders, environmentalists, economists, youths, and writers to consider these questions. The speakers and participants came from all part of the world and from diverse walks of life. But they had in common a sense of the urgency of consciously considering humanity's next steps rather than allowing current trends - many of which are remnants of the Cold War days - to dictate our destiny. The State of the World Forum, which met from September 28 through October 1 in San Francisco, is to be the first of a series of annual gatherings, culminating in the year 2000, which will consider prospects for global civilization as we enter a new millennium. A citizens' "global brain trust" launched at the forum, will propose solutions and global actions. GorbachevGorbachev opened the gathering by emphasizing the seriousness of our time in human history: "We are facing a sweeping crisis that challenges our entire civilization. It has expended most of its resources, its patterns of life are fading. We are in dire need of redefining the parameters of our society's economic, social, political, and social development." In particular, "the conflict between man and the rest of nature carries the risk of truly catastrophic consequences," he said. We are seeing a crisis in public life, in international relations, and in "the loss of fundamental spiritual values, the anchors that are indispensable for normal life worthy of human nature." Finally, we're experiencing a crisis of ideas. "The prevailing ideologies have proven to be incapable of either clarifying this situation or offering ways of dealing with it." With that, participants from about 50 countries began five days of meetings aimed at understanding the complex and interconnected shifts that are occurring in human civilization, and exploring how we might rise to meet these challenges. Not surprisingly, the discussion that ensued had aspects of the old paradigm as well as aspects of the new. At one roundtable, former Canadian Prime Minister Brian Mulroney met with Mikhail Gorbachev, Maurice Strong (convener of the Earth Summit), South African Executive Vice President Thabo Mbeki, Kurt Biedenkopf, premier of Saxony, Germany, and Noordin Sopiee of Malaysia to discuss democracy and human rights. Some used the roundtable as an opportunity to proclaim the victory of western-style "democracy" worldwide, often using the term as a code word for globalizing capitalism. Others pointed out that the developing world is evolving its own approaches to human rights, with an emphasis on rights to livelihood and education. At this roundtable, however, there was virtually no discussion about why there's been such a decline in meaningful democratic discourse in the industrialized world, nor what could be done about it. Nonetheless, the gathering was remarkable as a meeting ground for visionaries, creative thinkers, and world leaders. At one roundtable, authors Sam Keen, Ram Dass, Paul Hawken, and Duane Elgin, theologian Huston Smith and others examined the "colonization of desire" - the ways that the consumerism has become for many a surrogate for the spiritual nourishment that could meet people's deepest longings. Elsewhere, scientists Arno Penzias and Rustum Roy talked about the reformation of science and technology with Carl Sagan and Stan Grof. Others discussed the development of an Earth Charter for the 21st Century, the emergence of civil society to meet the needs left unmet by government and business, mechanisms that would steer economic development towards meeting human needs, the prospects for democratizing science and technology, and the expanding boundaries of "humanness." The scope of the challenges confronting us are not being faced, much less addressed by national governments. It is not at meetings of nation-states that the most creative global initiatives are being spawned; it is at the NGO (nongovernmental organizations) forums that accompany UN conferences. Likewise, the State of the World Forum gave participants an opportunity to leave behind the positions of national governments, break out of the molds of their disciplines, and leave behind the clichéd responses of the past. Scientistst could focus on human values; political leaders on spiritual longing; environmentalists on poverty; and spritual leaders on violence and consumerism. And young people from 28 countries, who were holding their own Youth Summit, were invited to participate fully in forum activities, bringing the conscience, freshness, and passion of youth to the proceedings (see Youth Agenda for the 21st Century in this issue). Creating a FutureWhile there was not a means by which to register either agreement or disagreement with a position or approach, consensus did emerge among many of those addressing that:
Next StepsWhat next? The State of the World Forum will meet again in San Francisco October 2-6, 1996, with Gorbachev and the co-chairs from the 1995 session convening, and many of the same participants, although forum organizers hope to broaden global representation. There will also be work groups meeting between now and then to consider steps to take in specific areas. Among them:
Times of ChangePeriods of change, as one era gives way to the next, are invariably turbulent, James Garrison, president of the Gorbachev Foundation, said in his opening remarks at the forum. "Sometimes, when it seems we are the most completely lost, we are paradoxically the most open to the guidance which allows us to redefine and renew ourselves." The State of the World Forum has now become an ongoing process leading up to the turn of the millenium. The stakes are especially high now, since for the first time we've become a global civilization with the capacity to do tremendous damage to life on Earth. Gorbachev indicated he is cautiously optimistic about the prospects: "I believe mankind, which was able to bring into being a unique civilization on our planet, will know how to keep that civilization from self-destruction." Doing so, according to James Garrison, will require a recognization that "Human interdependence, in all its multiplicity, contradiction, and splendor must now become our watchword ... interdependence with each other, interdependence with the Earth, interdependence with the Spirit which perennially guides the affairs of humankind."
Please support this web site ... and thanks if you already are! All contents copyright (c)1995, 1997 by Context Institute Please send comments to webmaster Last Updated 29 June 2000. URL: http://www.context.org/ICLIB/IC43/vnGldrPP.htm Home | Search | Index of Issues | Table of Contents |