Rx: Federal Support
For Community Health
An innovative community-based approach
to preventive health
by Ruth Caplan and Leonard Rodberg
One of the articles in Good Medicine (IC#39) Fall 1994, Page 58
Copyright (c)1994, 1997 by Context Institute
| To order this issue ...
If health care means the prevention of illness and not just caring for the
sick, then health services should be integrated into the goal of creating
healthy communities. Policy makers should examine how health services can
be embedded in local communities and integrated with the goals of job creation,
community development, and sustainability which are presently being pursued
on separate tracks by the Clinton administration.
A community-based approach to health services is not a new concept. Many
of the anti-poverty programs of the 1960s, funded through the Office for
Economic Opportunity (OEO), took a holistic approach to the improvement
of the lives of the poor. They frequently rested on the foundation of
neighborhood
or community health centers with a focus on maximum participation of the
community.
One example is in Mound Bayou, Mississippi, where the Delta Health Center
was founded in 1965.
The center began, not by the traditional means of building a structure
and hiring a professional staff, but with a series of meetings in homes,
churches and schools. As a result of these meetings, the residents of this
very poor region created 10 local health associations, each with their own
perspectives and priorities. Some needed clean drinking water without having
to walk three miles, others needed child care or elder care. Community
participation
led the health professionals to broaden their conception of "health"
to include food, jobs, housing and education, as well as personal and public
health.
In the words of Dr. Jack Geiger, a founder of the center: "Once
we had the health center going, we started stocking food in the center pharmacy
and distributing food - like drugs - to the people. A variety of officials
got very nervous and said, 'You can't do that.' We said, 'Why not?' They
said, 'It's a health center pharmacy, and it's supposed to carry drugs for
the treatment of disease.' And we said, 'The last time we looked in the
book, the specific therapy for malnutrition was food.' There was nothing
in the regulations that said otherwise, so we continued to do it."
But this was only the beginning. Poor sharecroppers throughout the 500
square mile area, displaced by the double-row cotton picking machine, decided
it was time to pool their labor and grow food instead of cotton. With additional
OEO funding, they found land and established a food growing and distributing
cooperative. In the first seven months, a million pounds of food was grown,
ending hunger and producing some surplus. Housing programs were also begun,
sewage systems were developed, and schooling was improved.
Funding has been cut back and federal regulations have confined staff
to carrying out traditional medical care, but Delta Health Center continues
to be a center of community life and a symbol of hope for people who are
left out of the mainstream of the nation's life.
Another community-based approach was developed in the 1970s and introduced
in Congress by Representative Ron Dellums of California as the Health Service
Act. Health services would be based on local health needs as determined
by community health boards. While similar in concept to local boards of
education, these boards would have an opportunity for broader input into
community planning. Under a system that has been described as "community
federalism," the members of the local boards would elect district and
regional boards responsible for operating hospitals and training health
care workers.
Today, another federal initiative designed for poor rural and urban areas
provides a potential model that could be developed and used to move all
communities toward community-defined health services.
The Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993 authorizes establishment of nine
empowerment zones and 95 enterprise communities. The applicant process requires
broad-based local input in developing a strategic vision for change that
responds to community needs in a comprehensive fashion, creates jobs, and
is sustainable.
Other federal programs for needy areas can be dovetailed. The Small Business
Administration has a microloan program for small entrepreneurs who can't
get credit from banks, and HUD now helps fund the National Community Development
Initiative, created by private foundations to provide low-interest loans
to nonprofit community development organizations.
Public and private pension funds can also be invested to meet local community
needs, following the example of New York City, where pension funds have
been invested in housing.
Clearly, creative partnerships can be forged between federal programs
and private and nonprofit funding in support of local community initiatives.
By combining these initiatives with community health activities, the first
steps toward meaningful local job creation and community-based preventive
health care can be taken.
Ruth Caplan coordinates the Economics Working Group, a project which
examines underlying economic issues related to environmentally sustainable
development. She worked for seven years as executive director of Environmental
Action, where she co-authored the book, Our Earth, Ourselves.
Leonard Rodberg teaches urban affairs and health policy at Queens
College/CUNY in New York City. In the 1970s he led the development of the
Dellums Health Service Act. More recently, he has been involved in the health
care reform and sustainable development debates.
Please support
this web site ... and thanks if you already are!
All contents copyright (c)1994,
1997 by Context Institute
Please send comments to webmaster
Last Updated 29 June 2000.
URL: http://www.context.org/ICLIB/IC39/Caplan.htm
Home | Search
| Index of Issues | Table
of Contents
|