Work Time, Free Time
The balance of work and leisure in Europe, Japan, and the US
by Kim Bush
One of the articles in It's About Time! (IC#37) Winter 1994, Page 42
Copyright (c)1994, 1996 by Context Institute
| To order this issue ...
Not all of the industrialized world has the same balance of work
and non-work time that we do in the US. In Japan, the corporate-warrior
culture is being challenged by young people who want more from life.
Meanwhile, in Europe, there is a move afoot to reduce work hours that
are already substantially lower than those in the US. Halting the expansion
of forced overtime is about as far as US unions have taken the effort
to reduce work hours, but there are indications that the shorter work
week could again become a goal of the American labor movement.
Running Out Of Time:
Germany And Japan
an interview with Vivia Boe, by Kim Bush
To find out about work time and leisure time in Germany and Japan,
we turned to the producers of Running Out of Time, an hour-long documentary
that examines what has come to be known as "time famine" in the
US. Running Out of Time, a production of Oregon Public Broadcasting
and KCTS-Seattle contrasts the long vacations and paid leaves enjoyed
by German workers with the long hours worked in Japan and the US.
Vivia Boe is associate producer of Running out of Time, which will
air nationwide this fall.
Kim: What was your reason for going to Japan and Germany in
preparation for the production?
Vivia: We went to Germany to find a counterpart for the American single
mother who plays a central role in the show. In Japan we were primarily
interested in the phenomenon of karoshi - death from overwork - but
we also wanted to learn how their overworked society compared to ours.
Kim: What did you turn up on your visit to Japan?
Vivia: In Japan we found out that karoshi is now the second leading
cause of death after cancer. There are 10,000 confirmed victims, but some
think the number may, in fact, be upwards of 30,000.
In Tokyo we contacted the Karoshi Hotline, set up by a group of lawyers
in 1988 to help victims who were filing compensation claims with the government.
The victims of karoshi death range in age from 34 to 61; they really
do just drop dead after an aorta or blood vessel in the brain explodes.
Karoshi is the most extreme symptom of overwork, but it grows out of
the corporate-warrior culture pervasive in Japan where a man is supposed
to be a 24-hour champion for his company. In fact, there's a commercial
on TV for an energy drink with a very popular jingle: "Can you battle
24 hours a day?" Everyone in Japan knows it, and we were told that
some companies sing it every morning.
Time for anything but work seems to be extremely limited. So much so that
young families don't even have time to visit their elders. An ingenious
business has developed to meet this need. "Rent-A-Family" sends
out actors to visit lonely parents. The company has a waiting list of 1,000
and appears to be very popular. It seems pretty bizarre, but actually these
people are providing a very important service. The old people said they
just wanted to touch the skin of a baby and that it had made their lives
different to have lunch and visit the playground with the kids who were
part of the rented family.
Kim: Did you see signs of resistance to the corporate-warrior culture,
say, among the younger generation?
Vivia: I think that the younger workers and the wives of men who've
succumbed to karoshi definitely have started to turn away from it.
They seem to have reached their biological speed limit. I'm not sure how
widespread it is but there's a popular phrase among young people: "My
time after five." But there's tremendous peer pressure to stay at their
desks, putting in what they call "face time."
Salaried men in their 50s and 60s are the real corporate warriors; you see
them in packs drinking and not returning home until late at night, because
if you come home too early, it means something's wrong at work, and your
wife and neighbors might think you're not holding up your end. On the other
hand, younger husbands are getting home for dinner more often than once
a week. In fact, unions are promoting a shorter work week with the slogan
"Let's have a Japan where families can eat dinner together."
There are other signs that younger workers have had enough, including a
growing interest in leisure activities, evidenced by booming markets for
camping gear and other recreational products. There does seem to be a growing
feeling in Japan that people deserve some time off work, that they should
have a life of their own.
Kim: What did you find out about the German approach to work and
leisure? Is it similar to that of the US?
Vivia: The differences are very striking. We discovered this quickly
in our interviews with Diana, a German worker in her late 20s. She's a single
mother who was born in East Germany but currently puts in a six-hour day
as a secretary/librarian with Schering, a large chemical company in Berlin.
She chose her company's flextime option in order to spend more time with
her little boy. The plan also entitles her to six weeks of paid vacation,
approximately 15 paid holidays and 18 days of sick leave, which she and
others use quite freely in order to have time for shopping since stores
are closed in the evenings and on Sundays and open only until noon on Saturdays.
Kim: What's the result of all that free time? How does Diana use
it differently from her American counterpart?
Vivia: Well, first off she has several hours with her little boy every
day, as compared to just minutes a day for Japanese and American workers.
Diana really did have a life outside of work; she studies languages, rides
her bicycle, travels, and goes to movies - she's a real film buff. She and
the other Germans we met seem to have created a real leisure society in
which they don't live to work, but instead work to live. Even more important
for her was that she never felt pressed, but had plenty of time for family
and friends. We never heard this in the US. Never.
Kim: But is the German economy suffering as a result? We hear so
much about productivity, comparing Japanese, Germans, and Americans...
Vivia: Chancellor Helmut Kohl complains about the country being run
like a giant amusement park, but what we observed was that when Germans
are at work they work very hard. In fact, the statistics are on Diana's
side: Germans are much more productive than either the Japanese or the Americans.
They don't spend their time off recuperating so that they can go back to
work on Monday, which seems to be the case in the States.
"Work Less And Everyone Works!"
by Kim Bush
Lavorare meno. Lavorare tutti. (Work less. Everyone works.) A
familiar slogan in Italian workplaces, it echoes a growing sense among Europeans
that one prescription for the region's chronic unemployment might be a shorter
work week. In government buildings and around bargaining tables, a four-day
work week has become a hot topic of negotiation. On the other hand, most
US companies remain committed to the 40-hour week plus increasing amounts
of mandatory overtime.
Why a four-day work week in Europe? The strongest arguments grow out of
Europe's chronic unemployment problem. Since 1970, the number of jobs in
European Community countries has increased by only 7 percent, while real
economic growth totaled 73 percent.
A French advocate of the shorter work week, economist Pierre Larrouturou
told the Christian Science Monitor: "Under current conditions
[France] would need an annual growth rate of 5 to 6 percent to bring down
unemployment, and we can't count on that."1 Larrouturou and others
propose that France reduce its work week to 33 hours and reduce salaries
by 5 percent. They believe that such a move would result in the creation
of up to 2 million new jobs as well as a 5 percent gain in productivity.
The French Senate approved a measure that would promote experimentation
with a 33-hour week, but a similar plan was defeated in the National Assembly.
While the political debate inches forward, some companies and unions have
acted on their own to shorten the work week. Subsidiaries of US-based Hewlett-Packard
and Digital, for example, faced by the choice of major layoffs or sweeping
reorganization of work schedules, chose the latter. As a result, no employee
at Hewlett-Packard works more than a four-day week, although the plant is
in operation seven days a week. Digital offered its 4,000 employees the
choice of a four-day week with an accompanying 7 percent pay cut, and 530
employees opted for it, saving 90 jobs that otherwise would have been cut.
In Germany, Volkswagen recently concluded an agreement with the I.G. Metall
union for a 28.8 hour work week - a 20 percent reduction in hours - coupled
with a 10 percent cut in pay.
BMW's Regensburg plant went to a four-day 36-hour week in 1990, but BMW
did not reduce wages since they believe their productivity gains balance
out the cost of hiring more people. Other companies in Europe, like the
pharmaceutical giant Schering, have noted similar results.
Although the idea of a reduced work week is steadily gaining favor in many
European countries, there are those who fear its long-term consequences.
A German banker in a New York Times interview opined, "You do
not resolve a problem by working less."2 A French middle manager worried,
"You'll have people consuming less, when what we need is higher consumption
to prime the recovery."3
The reactions to the four-day week initiative among lower management and
rank-and-file workers are also mixed. Some are afraid that the shorter work
week is only a harbinger of continued cuts without protecting job security
or wages.
Others welcome the change. Martine Desmond, a personnel manager for Digital
who was one of the 530 to opt for the four-day week, told New York Times
reporter Roger Cohen that, "I am more efficient in my work, less stressed
out and speedy (off work), and have not seen my life style much affected
by the pay cut."4
US UNIONS COOL TO SHORTER HOURS
In the US, however, talk about a shorter work week has a less urgent tone.
Some legislators, most of them members of the Congressional Black Caucus
have introduced a bill to establish a government-mandated 30-hour week.
Representative Lucien Blackwell from Philadelphia, the sponsor of the bill,
says, "reducing the standard work week to 30 hours requires large corporations
to hire more employees, promotes family-friendly workplaces, and helps move
Americans off public assistance programs."
US employers, unlike their European counterparts, pay a large part of their
employees' health benefits. To avoid paying greater benefits costs for an
expanded work force, they are more inclined to stretch the work week instead
of cutting it. The result has been increased overtime for a downsized labor
force and greater reliance on part-time and contingent labor.
The AFL-CIO speaks for most of organized labor when it points out that just
by cutting out overtime 3 million new jobs would be created. Their official
line is simple: until the 40-hour week without forced overtime is re-established
as the national standard, there's not much point in discussing a 32-hour
week.
But there are signs that some union leaders are rethinking their tactical
opposition to a shorter week. At the latest annual convention of the AFL-CIO
in October, Lynn Williams of the United Steelworkers of America remarked
that, the shorter work week is "becoming a higher and higher item on
the agenda as we watch this alleged economic recovery unfold without creating
enough jobs."5
His views were echoed by Vincent R. Sombrotto of the National Association
of Letter Carriers, who told a New York Times reporter on October
11, 1993: "They talk about retraining [as a solution for unemployment],
but retraining for what? As the population grows and we're squeezed out
of manufacturing, we have to think about how to stretch jobs to more people."6
Some newer dissenting voices in organized labor, notably the New Directions
Movement of the United Auto Workers, have taken the debate one step further
by making a shorter work week a part of their plan to save jobs. The UAW
recently dusted off a slogan of the 1970s - "seven hour day for eight
hours pay" - in negotiations at the Chrysler minivan plant in St. Louis
and achieved a 35-hour week there in 1992.
The shorter work week also has advocates outside the labor movement such
as the Society for the Reduction of Human Labor and the Shorter Work Time
Group (SWTG). The SWTG proposes a 10 Point Plan for Shorter Work-Time, which
includes a six-hour day, 30-hour week "full-time" standard with
no loss in pay; longer paid vacations and more creative family leave policies;
and stricter controls on overtime work. Their more general goals are to
combat overwork and workaholism, and to convince the US public that less
work rather than more is better for everyone and for the economy.
Footnotes:
1. Howard LaFranchi, "Public's 'Furious Pessimism' Over the Decline
in Jobs Spurs Hot Debate in France,"Christian Science Monitor, Nov.
10, 1993
2. Roger Cohen, "Europeans Ponder Working Less So More of Them Can
Have Jobs" New York Times, Nov. 22, 1993
3. Christian Science Monitor, op cit
4. New York Times, op cit
5. Peter T. Kilborn, "Labor Wants Shorter Hours to Make Up for Job
Losses," New York Times, Oct. 11, 1993
6. ibid
Please support
this web site ... and thanks if you already are!
All contents copyright (c)1994, 1996 by Context
Institute | To order this issue ...
Please send comments to webmaster
Last Updated 29 June 2000.
URL: http://www.context.org/ICLIB/IC37/Bush2.htm
Home | Search | Index of Issues
| Table of Contents
|