Measuring Sustainability
An update on Sustainable Seattle's Indicators
by Alan AtKisson
One of the articles in It's About Time! (IC#37) Winter 1994, Page 8
Copyright (c)1994, 1996 by Context Institute
| To order this issue ...
What do wild salmon runs, juvenile crime rates, and employment levels at
the world's largest airplane manufacturer have in common? As any good systems
thinker knows, the answer is "everything."
More specifically, all three are indicators - measurements of the health
of larger systems - and they are part of a report recently completed by
Sustainable Seattle, a volunteer "civic forum" comprised of citizens
from business, government, environmental groups, and many other sectors
of the Seattle community.
The report, entitled 1993 Indicators of Sustainable Community examines 20
key trends over the past two decades to create a snapshot of the Seattle
area's "long-term cultural, economic, and environmental health and
vitality" - which is how the group defines sustainability.
The product of nearly three years of work involving over 200 people, the
indicators were designed to answer two questions: What would a sustainable
Seattle look like? And how can we measure our progress toward that goal?
Using indicators to measure trends in larger systems is nothing new. Two
familiar examples are the Dow Jones Industrial Average, in which 30 "blue
chip" stocks indicate the health of the stock market as a whole, and
the northern spotted owl, an "indicator species" that signals
the health of old growth forest ecosystems.
But Sustainable Seattle, inspired by related efforts at measuring quality
of life in Jacksonville and in Oregon, and by theorists like Hazel Henderson
and Herman Daly, has taken the idea two steps further. First, it focuses
on sustainability (as opposed to quality of life); and second, it examines
the linkages between indicators and the systems they represent.
For example, wild salmon runs are an indicator of water quality and the
health of riparian ecosystems (in addition to being intrinsically, symbolically,
and economically valuable). Salmon are also affected by electrical power
use and water consumption. Changes in the runs affects tourism and the seafood
industry. Looking at linkages expands our understanding of the reason for
a salmon run's decline and the benefits of working to maintain it.
Salmon runs in the Seattle area are in sharp decline and in danger of extinction.
That fact not only rings environmental and economic alarm bells; it could
also reflect our cultural attitude toward living systems. Ultimately, what's
happening to Seattle's salmon may not differ that much from what's happening
to Seattle's children. Our next generation - the focus of several important
indicators - are experiencing higher levels of childhood poverty, low birthweight,
and juvenile crime. As Kentucky writer Wendell Berry notes, "There
is an uncanny resemblance between our behavior toward each other and our
behavior toward the Earth."
But not all of Sustainable Seattle's first 20 indicators (out of a projected
set of 40) bring bad news. The job market, for example, is not as dependent
on the Boeing Company and other top-ten employers as it used to be. Over
the past decade, jobs have been spreading among a more diverse set of enterprises,
creating a more resilient economic base. And the hours of paid work at the
average wage required to meet basic needs like rent, food, and clothing
has remained remarkably stable.
Other indicators bring still more surprises. Air quality, which most citizens
would guess has been declining, has actually improved by 65 percent over
the decade. On the other hand, Seattle/King County residents are discarding
ever increasing amounts of garbage, at rates that almost outstrip the growth
in our famed recycling programs.
Overall, the indicators show Seattle to be a city moving away from sustainability.
But measuring progress is, of course, not the same as making it. Sustainable
Seattle is using the indicators to call attention to long-term trends, and
volunteers are now designing an ambitious array of efforts to turn these
trends in the right direction and encourage citizens and policy-makers to
help make sustainability a reality.
"Things have their due measure," wrote the Roman poet Horace some
2,000 years ago. "There are ultimately fixed limits, beyond which,
or short of which, something must be wrong." Horace lived in an imperial
city that ignored those limits, leading to its decline and fall. We in Sustainable
Seattle are working to ensure that our city stays healthy - indeed, keeps
getting better - for a long, long time.
Sustainable Seattle was initiated by IN CONTEXT and Metro Center YMCA. Its
44-page report, 1993 Indicators of Sustainable Community, is available
for $10 from Metrocenter YMCA, 909 4th Ave., Seattle, WA 98103.
Alan AtKisson, a co-founder of Sustainable Seattle, is former executive
editor of IC and now a consultant focusing on innovation, sustainability,
and cultural change. Write him at 546 N. 74th Street, Seattle, WA 98103.
Please support
this web site ... and thanks if you already are!
All contents copyright (c)1994, 1996 by Context
Institute | To order this issue ...
Please send comments to webmaster
Last Updated 29 June 2000.
URL: http://www.context.org/ICLIB/IC37/AtKisson.htm
Home | Search | Index of Issues
| Table of Contents
|