What Works and Why
In the search for clues to enhanced global cooperation,
here's what's already working
by Harlan Cleveland
One of the articles in Toward A Sustainable World Order (IC#36) Fall 1993, Page 42
Copyright (c)1993, 1996 by Context Institute | To order this issue ...
Harlan Cleveland has built his long political and academic career around
the study of national and global trends and solutions; he's a former US
ambassador to NATO, assistant US secretary of state, and foreign aid manager
under the Marshall Plan.
In his latest book, Birth of a New World, published by Jossey-Bass
this year, Cleveland draws from his experiences and looks at what he calls
an "open moment" in history, a time to re-examine the political
and economic structures that have shaped our current global crises.
These examples, which were excerpted, with permission of the author and
publisher, from Birth of a New World show that there's every reason
to believe that international cooperation is possible. After all, when governments
have put their minds to it, they've shown that they can make all kinds of
progress through cooperation!
The first thing that comes to mind when you think of world affairs may not
be love, or even tolerance, humanity, and cooperation. Most of the news
about international cooperation is its absence: distrust, suspicion, controversy,
conflict, terrorism, war.
Collaborative success, what's actually working, is seldom highlighted.
Yet if you stand back and look at the whole scene, you see all kinds of
international systems and arrangements that are working more or less the
way they are supposed to work:
- Eradication of infectious diseases. Diseases such as smallpox and diphtheria
have been wiped out, and malaria and others have been tackled by combining
medical science with a massive worldwide public health information system.
Coordinated through the World Health Organization, the system requires the
continuous cooperation of almost every nation on earth. Next on this never-ending
agenda: AIDS.
- The Law of the Sea. By an extraordinary act of consensus, the
world's nations spent 15 years rewriting ocean law in a book-length treaty,
the most complex single document ever negotiated among nations. The UN General
Assembly declared the deep ocean and its seabed to be "the common heritage
of mankind." By unanimous consent, the world's governments also provided
for stronger environmental protection and for military and scientific use
of the open ocean and the important narrow places in the world's seas.
Despite the absence of a US signature (because of its disagreement with
regulations on the use of the seabed) the White House later declared that
all the rest of the long treaty text had become "customary law."
- The Ozone Treaty. In 1974 two chemists first guessed that human
activities might be eroding the ozone shield that protects humanity from
receiving too much ultraviolet radiation from the sun. In 1987, only 13
years later, 50 nations agreed by treaty to slow down the use of ozone eaters,
such as CFCs, by setting emission targets but leaving to the market the
task of reducing CFCs. For reasons of fairness, those targets were tougher
on the richer countries than on the poorer ones and were left open for future
revision in a flexible and dynamic process.
The issues, says US diplomat Richard Benedick, were "staggeringly complex,"
the science still speculative, the evidence of damage missing. Yet this
remarkable achievement was possible because there was an international scientific
consensus, information on the subject flowed freely, the fact-finding process
pulled in the nongovernments (notably the industries using CFCs), and an
active international gadfly - the UN Environment Program (UNEP) - helped
push governments to set aside their conflicts on other matters and cooperate
on this one.
- The Antarctic Treaty. Twelve countries agreed in 1959 to suspend
their pie-shaped national claims to parts of Antarctica and open up the
entire continent for scientific research, including the core sampling of
ancient ice to help meteorologists and astronauts. The countries also banned
all military activity, nuclear tests, and disposal of nuclear wastes in
this frozen no-man's-land.
The treaty process is unusual in that there is no international staff; all
the political and administrative business is conducted at periodic meetings
hosted by the member countries in turn. When the treaty was reviewed in
1991, all signers stayed hitched and even added a 50-year ban on digging
for minerals.
- UN peacekeeping and peacemaking. "Soldiers without enemies"
have been stationed in many contentious corners of the world. And UN observers
and mediators - at times the secretary general himself or his personal representative
- have been active in dampening conflict and sometimes settling disputes
all around the world. (See also "UN Peacekeeping: Promise and Peril"
on page 50.)
- The High Commissioner for Refugees. The General Assembly set
up this office as a way of recognizing a universal responsibility toward
refugees and displaced persons for whom new homes had still to be found
after World War II. Today, with a very different ethnic mix of peoples,
there are more international refugees than there were forty years ago -
more than twice as many if people displaced inside their own countries are
counted. The UNHCR has stimulated actions that have saved many millions
of people from international homelessness and many from disease and death.
The High Commissioner's office twice has won the Nobel Peace Prize.
- International civil aviation. Planes of all nations use each other's
air space, control towers, and airfields with astonishingly few mishaps.
There is even an agreement that all communication between planes and controllers
will be in a common language: English.
- Allocation of the frequency spectrum. The International Telecommunications
Union periodically assembles an all-nations gathering called "Administrative
Radio Conference" to divide up the electromagnetic frequency spectrum
among all users and purposes. This international public regulation makes
possible an international market in radio and TV reception, satellite, phone,
and fax connections. It also makes space probes and modern military communication
possible.
- Weather forecasting. Beginning with a 1963 initiative of the Kennedy
Administration, the World Meteorological Organization developed the World
Weather Watch, which put to work picture-taking, communication, and remote-sensing
satellites.
A world weather system now merges observations every day from more than
100 countries, ships at sea, and balloons, with cloud pictures and wind
and moisture data from satellites.
- Globally oriented technology and communications. New systems of
measurement, modeling, and mathematics have generated an "ecumenical
movement" among the earth sciences, enabling experts to think seriously
and systematically about very large environmental issues in the framework
of a global commons.
- Cooperation in outer space. A generation ago, the United Nations
declared outer space and "celestial bodies" including the Moon
"the common province of mankind." There followed formal treaties
on issues such as damage to the Earth, and returning errant astronauts and
cosmonauts to their home countries.
As space began to fill up, other kinds of international cooperation seemed
necessary: banning bombs in orbit, keeping track of launches (which the
United Nations does), and crop forecasting. A 1978 French proposal to provide
the UN secretary general with the capacity to observe military movements
by satellite could turn out to be practical politics in the 1990s.
MAKING IT WORK
Why does international cooperation work - when it does? These characteristics,
when taken together, are the priceless ingredients for advances in global
cooperation:
- There is a consensus on desired outcomes. People who disagree
on almost everything else can agree, for example, that smallpox is a threat
to all, more accurate weather forecasts would be useful, civil aircraft
should not collide, and somebody should help refugees.
- No one loses. Each success story turned out to be a win-win game.
For instance, we did not begin to see real progress on disarmament until
both the Soviet Union and NATO concluded that their security would actually
be enhanced by eliminating dangerous but unusable weapons.
- Sovereignty is pooled. Cooperation does not mean giving up independence
of action but pooling it - that is, using sovereign rights together to avoid
losing them separately.
- Cooperation is stimulated by "a cocktail of fear and hope."
Alone, fear produces irrational - sometimes aggressive - behavior, and hope
produces good-hearted but unrealistic advocacy. Combined, reality-based
fear and hope seem to provide the motivation to cooperate.
- Individuals make things happen. In the early stages of each success
story, a few key individuals acted internationally to lead, insist, inspire,
share knowledge, and generate a climate of trust that brushed past the prevailing
distrust. On the World Weather Watch these were mostly scientific statesmen;
on smallpox eradication, public health doctors; on the Law of the Sea, visionary
lawyers including key players from the developing world.
- Modern information technologies are of the essence. The marriage
of computers and electronic telecommunications is driving the world toward
larger systems of cooperation.
- Nongovernments play a key role. The recent story of international
cooperation is replete with the contributions of scientific academies, research
institutes, women's groups, international companies, and "experts"
who don't feel the need to act as instructed representatives of their governments.
- Educated local talent is essential. Especially where developing
countries have major global roles to play, cooperation works best when they
develop and use their own experts and systems managers.
- Flexible, uncentralized systems work best. The more complicated
the task and the more diverse the players, the more necessary it is to spread
the work around so many kinds of people are improvising on an agreed sense
of direction.
A sensible system of peaceful change for more people than ever before in
world history is a feasible goal. Some steps in its direction already have
been taken - piecemeal, the practical way. The guiding principles have made
themselves apparent. The puzzle, complex but not insoluble, is how to move
- no doubt untidily, in a zigzag course - toward carrying into action what
the past half-century has taught us by trial and error.
Please support
this web site ... and thanks if you already are!
All contents copyright (c)1993, 1996 by Context
Institute | To order this issue ...
Please send comments to webmaster
Last Updated 29 June 2000.
URL: http://www.context.org/ICLIB/IC36/Clevelnd.htm
Home | Search | Index of Issues
| Table of Contents
|