Essential Peacemaking
Bringing together the oldest adversaries: women and men
an interview with Danaan Parry and Jerilyn Brusseau, by Robert
Gilman
One of the articles in Exploring Our Interconnectedness (IC#34) Winter 1993, Page 52
Copyright (c)1993, 1996 by Context Institute
| To order this issue ...
Nowhere do the deep uncertainties over the right balance of interconnection
and separation affect us more personally than in the area of gender relations.
If we can't make peace here, we are unlikely to be able to have peace on
a societal or international level.
That's certainly the conclusion to which Danaan Parry and Jerilyn Brusseau
have come. They have each spent much of their lives as peace makers, Danaan
as co-founder of the Earthstewards Network, and Jerilyn as founder of Peace
Table. Both were extensively involved with citizen diplomacy in the former
USSR, with peace work in the Middle East, and with the Peace Trees program
(see IC #20, page 54; IC #22: page 51; IC #28: page
42; IC #33: page 38).
Now they've combined forces in a new program called Essential Peacemaking/Women
and Men.© Their intention with this program is to help bring into
being a broad-based - indeed, world-wide - grassroots process in which women
and men can have a healing dialogue within a safe environment, overcome
miscommunications, and grow a deeper trust and synergy both within and between
the sexes.
To help get this process rolling, they've developed a format for a one-day
Essential Peacemaking gathering that is simple enough to be widely replicated.
In addition, they've developed a series of two workshops to train facilitators
for these one-day gatherings.
In early October 1992, four of us from Context Institute (Carla Cole, Duane
Fickeisen, Diane Gilman and I) took part in the first (two-day) workshop,
and at the end of that month, Diane and I took the second (three-day) workshop
for facilitators. The short report is: it works.
Three aspects of the Essential Peacemaking process seem to me to make it
particularly effective and replicable:
- The process is simple in a sophisticated way, involving a half-dozen
specific activities for the one-day gathering. Drawing on their experience
working with groups and with gender issues, Danaan and Jerilyn have honed
the process to just what is essential - and that makes it possible to do
a credible job of preparing facilitators through the five-day training process.
- The process provides a framework, but the content comes from the participants
themselves, from their own experiences. This is not a place to learn what
some workshop leader thinks is the politically correct way to deal with
gender issues; rather it is a place to explore the complexity of these issues
as they exist in the lives of real people, and then grow beyond what is
to what can be.
- The steps in the process alternate between single-gender activities
(men sharing with men, women sharing with women) and mixed-gender activities
(where women and men are together). This allows a level of discovery and
growth that is essentially impossible in only one of those formats.
To me, Essential Peacemaking represents a much needed next step in the women's
and men's movements. I hope it is an early sign of a much broader trend.
A few days after we had finished the second workshop, I had a chance to
talk with Jerilyn and Danaan about Essential Peacemaking:
Robert: You have been involved with all kinds of conflict resolution
projects in the past. Why are you now focusing on gender issues?
Jerilyn: For the past several years my work has been bringing people
together to share the culinary and agricultural traditions unique to their
own cultures: Arab cultures, Latin cultures, Western European, all over
the old Soviet Union, North American, Hispanic cultures in North America,
and the cultures of people of color in this country. Through exploring these
traditions, quite accidentally I discovered a connection to the other women
involved that I didn't necessarily feel elsewhere, and doors opened to their
sharing what was really deep, meaningful, and very close to their hearts.
That sharing has led to the work of Essential Peacemaking, which I see as
a process for exploring the issues that have kept our genders apart and
that could bring our genders more closely together in dynamic and powerful
ways.
Danaan: I came to the importance of working with gender issues from
a frustrating search for what works for effective conflict resolution. My
particular interest is in helping people work with their conflicts to find
common ground and to look into the deeper conflicts that we usually ignore
because we focus instead on the resolution of surface conflicts.
The truth is, it's a frustrating business because most people don't want
to look there. They'd rather kill each other, or they want to get fixed
up just enough to cope.
Robert: What sorts of conflicts are you thinking of?
Danaan: Arabs and Israelis arguing about whether the Koran or the Torah
is right. Catholics and Protestants in Northern Ireland fighting over issues
which they have fought over for hundreds of years. They will continue to
fight over these unless they are willing to look deeper - at their real
fears. In my experience, these fears don't lie with religion or with land
or territorial imperatives; they lie deeper than that.
So what is an avenue that one can invite people to walk along that will
lead to a place that is dark and deep enough where the real answers lie?
The only consistent answer to that question that I have found is gender
issues. I'm excited about gender issues as gender issues, but I'm more excited
about gender issues being a crack in the door into a very deep, and usually
dark and scary, but incredibly productive and alive place, where, when we
are willing to go there, we really do resolve our conflicts. It's an invitation
to intimacy, and almost all conflict is a cry for intimacy.
Perhaps because it's a subject everybody relates to, "women and men"
is mysterious and fascinating enough to draw people into amazingly deep
explorations. And most times, there is a doorway that leads to the resolution
of different conflicts as well.
I can get Catholic men and Protestant men in Northern Ireland talking in
the same room about what it's like to be a man, but I can never get them
to start talking in the same room about what it's like to be an Irish Catholic
and an Irish Protestant. Yet once I've got them in the same room talking
about as deep an issue as gender, there is a possibility of my bridging
from that to other issues that impact their lives, but not the other way
around.
Robert: What are you discovering about women and men through this?
Jerilyn: A lot of commonality across cultures. The issues women voice
and the values we express seem like a shared deep taproot into something
that is woman. I see the same kind of thing in the men as well.
Danaan: I agree. When you get down to the stuff men deal with, as men,
there is such a congruence of issues that it is scary, amazing, and wonderful
all at the same time.
It probably won't come as any surprise to you that self-esteem is a fundamental
issue. One of the things that we hear a lot in the trainings - I'm going
to generalize but it's a pretty good one and definitely cross-cultural -
is that most women have something inside of them that is ashamed to be a
woman and most men have something inside of them that is ashamed to be a
man. There is some element in the answer to the question of, "What
is it like to be a man?" that is "I'm not proud of it."
Jerilyn: Likewise what I hear and see and feel from thousands of women
in every culture I've visited is this generalized feeling that we're the
lesser breed. That's quite a legacy to live out!
Danaan: Isn't that interesting that men are saying it about men and
women are saying it about women? We're not saying it across the sexes as
much as we're saying it about ourselves.
Jerilyn: Yet here we are in 1992, a time of women rediscovering and
reaffirming our tremendous value and strength. Many women have, through
the centuries, held on to that strength and many, many women haven't. There
is a lot of wounding, on all sides, that needs to be healed.
We need to sit down with each other and allow the differences to be, and
rather approach with awe that two beings can hold such differences as male
and female. Then we can begin taking the wires off of the bomb.
We also need to learn to stand on the esteem, honor, and dignity of our
own gender, and to speak from that place. It's like a well. When I can begin
to live out of that well of the deep strength and dignity of woman, then
I can begin to learn of the depth of the well that is man.
Danaan: Just as Jerilyn and other women seem to have been taught that
they were second-class citizens, you can ask, "Well, what were men
taught?" Were we taught that we're first-class citizens?
It would have been interesting to have gotten that message, but I didn't
get that. What I got was that I was responsible for the mess. That may translate
into being the first-class citizen but it's a pretty lousy transfer. The
message I got was that, "You men are responsible, you have all the
wars, you kill all the people, you rape all the women, you molest all the
babies. It's you, you, you, you, you!" At some level, almost at a cellular
level, most men that I work with have that somewhere inside of them.
This collective guilt is like an iron blanket that keeps a lot of men -
not all men, but a lot of men - from ever changing. It's a "Catch 22":
the guilt is so heavy that you can never get beyond the guilt to change
the system, which then propagates the old system, including more guilt.
For us to be able to heal, or for us even to listen to one another, it has
to come from a basis of respect. And the first step in that respect is for
us to respect ourselves. When I feel good about being a man then I can use
that male energy for something I'll be proud of.
The good news is that regular folks have the skills, caring, and creativity
to do this. In my experience, men sharing with men about being men is a
very exciting, cutting edge process. We get into it and we love it. A level
of trust builds amazingly quickly where we can begin to respect one another,
and we can start to bring up otherwise unspeakable questions.
When that happens, we can come back to our sisters and begin to communicate
as whole human beings. They notice the difference. They feel it. And especially
when the women have done their work and come back as whole human beings,
all of a sudden we're talking about stuff that really counts, and being
human goes to another level.
Robert: What do you hope Essential Peacemaking will accomplish?
Danaan: I want to underline that part of the design of the Essential
Peacemaking process is a body of well-trained facilitators who reach out
around the planet - not just to the folks in Seattle or San Francisco, but
to those in Billings, Montana, or Cedar Falls, Iowa, or India, or Russia
as well. They are just as much a part of the positive change that needs
to happen as anyone else. We plan to really push to make that happen. The
whole design of this system is for enough people to do this work and take
it out into the world so that the facilitators of the Essential Peacemaking
gatherings are actually the field workers for a global community of men
and women who are healing the man/woman wound, building the trust and the
respect that we talked about.
Jerilyn: In a practical way, these facilitators are a microcosm of what
can be. That is, when a woman and a man work together to facilitate a gathering,
they are going to deal with much that comes up around women and men working
together in partnership. They're bringing other men and women together too,
but the simple fact that they're willing to go through it is a really important
model .
Hopefully this will be part of a trickle-up process. The more there are
these grass-roots gatherings co-led by women and men who can relate to each
other, the more it will be commonplace for women and men to be co-leading
in the world. Just imagine the leaders of the countries being co-leaders,
a male and female at the helm.
I have this dream of a balanced world where manipulation and abuse, betrayal
and reprisal, will have fallen into the past. And so we will, in an evolutionary
way, move past our need to destroy ourselves and each other.
For more information about Essential Peacemaking, contact the Earthstewards
Network, PO Box 10697, Bainbridge Island, WA 98110, 206/842-7986.
Please support
this web site ... and thanks if you already are!
All contents copyright (c)1993, 1996 by Context
Institute | To order this issue ...
Please send comments to webmaster
Last Updated 29 June 2000.
URL: http://www.context.org/ICLIB/IC34/Parry.htm
Home | Search | Index of Issues
| Table of Contents
|