Unfinished Business
There is much to be done to make multicultural education
a reality
- and project REACH is doing it
by David Koyama
One of the articles in The Learning Revolution (IC#27) Winter 1991, Page 38
Copyright (c)1991, 1996 by Context Institute
Within ten years, one in three Americans will be from an ethnic minority
group. The nation's fifty largest cities will have a majority student population
coming from these ethnic minority groups. The bulk of America's sunbelt,
including California and Texas, will have "minority majorities"
in their public school systems, giving new meaning to the term "minority".
Yet it is clear from all of the focus on "at-risk" populations
that we are not doing well in educating this increasing segment of our nation.
And when the Christian Science Monitor reports in November 1986 that
black students are labeled as mildly mentally handicapped more than three
times as often as white students, our underpinning national assumption
that all people are created equal takes on a hollow ring.
The truth of the past ten years is that we still have a lot of unfinished
business.
It has always been one of the major educational responsibilities of schools
in the United States to prepare students for participation in a multicultural
democratic society. Schools are encouraged to develop programs and curricula
that reflect our nation's cultural diversity and enhance our students' ability
to relate in a multicultural society.
Sadly, for the past ten years, there has been only one multicultural
program validated through the National Diffusion Network and the Department
of Education as a program that does just that. This is Project REACH - an
acronym that stands for Respecting Ethnic And Cultural Heritage. Taught
at the middle school level, the program was judged to have increased students'
level of knowledge of the history and culture of Asian Americans, Hispanics,
African Americans, and American Indians, while increasing the degree to
which students valued cultural diversity. The latter measurement was obtained
using the Bogardus Social Distance Scale, a survey which measures the degree
of social involvement preferred by a student for different ethnic groups.
The REACH program is divided into four phases. The Human Relations Skill
phase seeks to enhance self-awareness, self-esteem, and interpersonal communications.
The second phase, Cultural Self-Awareness, provides the students with the
opportunity to explore their own personal cultures. This culminates in a
school-wide cultural fair with student projects on display. In the third
phase, Multicultural Awareness, the students use a set of booklets, The
Ethnic Perspectives Series, which presents American history from diverse
ethnic points of view. The recognition of multiple perspectives is a key
principle to multicultural education. As one American Indian parent shared
with his school board: "In thirteen years of education, this multicultural
program is the only chance my children get in school to read their own history."
For the fourth phase, Cross-Cultural Experience, learning is applied and
made personal through exchanges with students and adults from different
ethnic groups.
More recently, an elementary program has emerged from the REACH Center
in Arlington, Washington. Called REACH for Kids, the program provides teachers
with a model curriculum K-6 that demonstrates what multiculturally infused
units might look like. This is accompanied by a strong teacher in-service
program to provide the conceptual background and support for implementing
multicultural concepts into other parts of the curriculum.
REACH for Kids also revolves around four considerations. The first is
an integration-of- disciplines approach so that multicultural education
is seen as more than social studies. This also minimizes the "kibbles
and bits" approach to curriculum and develops themes more realistically.
Another consideration is for enhancing self-esteem. A number of studies
have tied self-esteem to tolerance for diversity. Multicultural education
must contend with the hearts as well as the minds of students.
The third consideration is the examination of instructional strategies
to deliver the curriculum. Units are often written for cooperative grouping
activities which reinforce the human relations skills that students must
learn and practice. Teachers are reminded to examine some of their instructional
practices that may have become unintentional impediments to equitable learning
access for different students.
The final consideration is to distinguish between multicultural and global
education and to build the bridges that link these concepts. Global education
refers to all the diversity beyond our national borders while the former
encompasses the cultural diversity within our country. Studying Japanese
folktales may not have anything to do with learning about Japanese Americans.
While both activities are important, too often the development of global
perspectives de-emphasizes the importance of multicultural understanding.
When a second-grade teacher said that she always taught multiculturally
because she taught units on Japan and China, she was missing the point.
In World War II, others missed the same point, much to the dismay of Japanese
Americans.
Unfinished business.
David Koyama is Affirmative Action Officer for the Bellevue, WA Public
Schools and the Director of REACH. Contact REACH at 239 N. McLeod, Arlington,
WA 98223, 206/435-8682.
Multicultural Resources
by Millie L. Russell and C. Sybil Brown
When we think of multicultural education, we think first of opportunity
- equal educational opportunity. This means deliberate intervention to enable
students to achieve at their highest ability levels. It also includes accurate
lessons in world history, a reverence for the contributions of diverse people,
and ensuring enriched multicultural, multiracial and multigenerational daily
experiences. But for this to happen, our teachers must be aware of several
issues:
First, they need to know of important contributions to this country made
by numerous minority people. These include, for example, advances such as
blood plasma preservation developed by Dr. Charles Drew, the technique for
open heart surgery developed by Dr. Daniel Hale Williams, and the innovative
work of Dr. George Washington Carver.
Second, teachers need to be knowledgeable about the materials available
through the school district. Excellent resources have been assembled and
curriculum developed, yet they are often not used. Included among these
are the Responsive Multicultural Basic Skills Handbook for Teachers and
Parents: Overview by Francione N. Lewis (1984, reprinted in 1985 and
in 1986 by the State of Washington Superintendent of Public Instruction);
the Social Studies School Service Catalog available from 10200 Jefferson
Boulevard, Room 171, Box 802, Culver City, CA 90232; the extensive resources
of the Educational Materials and Services Center, 144 Railroad Avenue, Suite
107, Edmonds, WA 98020; and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology's
1990 Action Plan for Minorities .
Third, teachers need to understand that respect for culturally diverse
students is important to student achievement. This is simply sound educational
theory - the environment plus the information should promote high-level
learning.
Fourth, teachers must be proficient in speaking English in order to model
and to teach. For example, correct phonetic sounds must be repeatedly heard
by students for them to read and to write clear sentences. Non-English speaking
students should be taught by teachers with strong English skills.
Fifth, consultants like Dr. Ed Nichols and Dr. Asa Hilliard are invaluable
for training staff when the focus is directed toward multicultural education
for all teachers and administrators. This training should not simply be
an option.
Multicultural education speaks to truth! It answers questions about America
that explain why the haves have and the havenots have not. It prepares American
students for a world marketplace by recognizing that attitudes affect outcomes
in every arena of human interaction. It must revolutionize the current American
educational institution, which is unsuitable for a kaleidoscopic world.
We, as parents, students, school personnel, legislators and organizations,
must unite to make schools work as they should for all of our children.
Millie L. Russell is Assistant to the Vice President, Office of Minority
Affairs, U. of Washington. C. Sybil Brown is a retired Public School Principal.
Please support
this web site ... and thanks if you already are!
All contents copyright (c)1991,
1996 by Context Institute
Please send comments to webmaster
Last Updated 29 June 2000.
URL: http://www.context.org/ICLIB/IC27/Koyama.htm
Home | Search
| Index of Issues | Table
of Contents
|