Gaian Leadership
Leadership that helps people overcome "disabling
beliefs"
is an important part of mobilizing global action
An Interview with David Gershon, by Robert Gilman
One of the articles in Global Climate Change (IC#22) Summer 1989, Page 54
Copyright (c)1989, 1997 by Context Institute
David Gershon and his partner, Gail Straub, were the organizers of
the first Earth Run, a remarkable event in which a torch of peace was carried
around the world by relay teams of long-distance runners. (See "Earth
Run," IC #17.) For ten years they have also been leading workshops
in personal empowerment, and David has now brought his experiences to bear
on the question of global organizing to effect transformative change at
the grassroots - critical to addressing the challenges associated with climate
change. Developing highly skilled leaders is, he believes, essential to
the process.
For further information on David and Gail's work, contact them at
449A Route 28A, West Hurley, NY 12491.
Robert: You have the unusual background of having organized
a global level activity in the first Earth Run. What do you think can be
done to organize a world-wide response to the challenge of global climate
change?
David: The area I have begun to explore is leadership. We need
to find a new way of approaching the challenge. It's not just coming
up with solutions, because there are any number of good solutions out there.
It's mobilizing people to believe that we can make changes. And that
starts with leadership. It starts with a new kind of leader who integrates
effectiveness - knowing how to inspire and motivate people - with an understanding
of the deep, inner part of the person that needs to be touched if people
are to be fully engaged.
The activity required right now to move the planet to a new place is
beyond the normal sphere of everyday activity for most people. Just doing
good works to relieve one's guilt isn't sustainable. While doing the Earth
Run, I discovered that people will reprioritize their lives on behalf of
something larger than themselves when they have a vision of what can happen,
what is possible. Everyone who participated in organizing their community,
country, or region of the world had an inner calling that gave them the
willingness to go through all the hardship that's required to make anything
happen. They were creating something they thought could make the
world better, as opposed to reacting against something that wasn't working.
Robert: What other contributions can leadership make?
David: One of the keys is a global vision, something capable of
galvanizing people all over the world. People need to see that their individual
actions are building up to something. To use one of your images that I've
now adopted, they need to see that their drops in the bucket are filling
up the bucket. So creating a bucket - an overall strategy, and a campaign
in which everyone can see how they fit in - is a central ingredient.
Robert: The Earth Run is a great example of that process. What
other lessons did you learn from that experience?
David: Doing the Earth Run was like climbing Mt. Everest. We learned
a lot about how to bring a large number of key elements together around
a single objective, including leaders of countries and people at the grassroots.
We learned how to mobilize social creativity. I had thought a single event
like that might be catalytic, but I learned that change is a much longer-term
process.
Robert: You've continued to explore ways of facilitating change.
What are you focusing on now?
David: My new project is called the Gaia Leadership Project, and
it involves developing leadership skills, knowledge, and networking among
leaders, as well as an overall campaign. I use the term "Gaia"
because it speaks to the more ecologically and spiritually balanced approach
to leadership that's needed now.
Since doing the Earth Run, I've been looking at how to overcome things
that prevent people from acting - things like disabling beliefs. One of
these is "I can't make a difference," or "The problem is
too big, and whatever I did would just be a token." So, as part of
the Project, I designed Gaia Leadership Training program specifically to
provide us with the knowledge, skills, empowerment, and cross-fertilization
to overcome those beliefs and to help us take the effort of transformation
seriously enough to learn how to do it well.
It's as though we have to fight a battle, but no one really knows how
to go about fighting it. We all go out in isolated ways, and often at
cross-purposes,
and our skills are whatever we've picked up along the way. We've never stopped
to look at what we want, how we want to get there, what's the best way to
do it. So one of the elements in my long-term strategy was to design a training
program to upgrade our quality and skill level.
The second element was to look at these different activities and initiatives
and ask how we can align them. Again using the metaphor of a battle, all
these different generals need to go out together in concert. We're all
individuals,
and it's very hard to find ways to synergize, to cooperate, to share resources,
even though we recognize that the problem is bigger than any one activity.
The third thing that I've begun looking at is an overarching strategy
or campaign to which everyone would be willing to give their allegiance
- not really a coordinated activity, because the system's far too complex,
but rather a context. The phrase we're using is "The Campaign
for the Earth," but it needs to be larger than simply an umbrella
organization.
Robert: Because that's not broad enough?
David: Right. But how do you manage that? What's the best way
to coordinate, the best way to communicate? I don't know, but I do
know that decentralization is a key principle. With the Earth Run we created
this key idea of the light circling the Earth, and each of the countries
- and the communities within those countries - was responsible for making
sure that the light moved through their part of the planet. They did it
in their own way, they celebrated it in their own way, and so forth.
Robert: What are some of the graduates of your training program
doing?
David: They're doing a number of things, from developing community
environmental awareness programs to running organizations with more environmental
sensitivity. There's not any one issue they focus on, but they're looking
at how to do things from a transformational perspective. That's the key
underlying concept. I call them "transformational change agents"
because they're looking at what we want to create, as opposed to
what isn't working and needs to be fixed.
When we fix something, we're still at ground zero. And ground zero isn't
good enough anymore. We need to find new models, new systems, new approaches
- drawing upon the old ones, of course, but looking at what we want
as opposed to what we don't want in our lives, our communities, or the world
at large. We need to envision how we want the world to be.
Along with the visionary work, graduates are taught practical skills
in leadership, empowering others, financing your activity, doing public
relations and media-outreach, motivating others on your team, creating synergy
to draw forward true group genius, and on and on - everything that I think
is needed to be a transformational change agent.
I sometimes like to think of what I'm doing as the "spiritual warrior
school," and I define "spiritual warrior" as one who is integrating
the path of action in the world on behalf of something larger - in this
case Gaia - with the path of inner development. I think the time we're living
in is calling forth people who are skillful; who understand strategy, tactics,
effectiveness; who can get the job done and who are doing it from a more
enlightened perspective - and in a way that furthers their own individual
evolution.
Robert: What would mobilize media attention and other kinds
of support for your program and others like it? What would really get a
global effort going?
David: There are several levels to that question, and let me address
the deepest one. What needs to happen to make a transformational worldview
come forward? People are open to it now in a way that I've never experienced
before. During the Earth Run it was an effort to get people to respond to
a global initiative. But now, people are ripe.
I think the largest challenge we face is learning to cooperate. There
is an implicit assumption that cooperation is something you just do -
but very few people know how to go about it. True cooperation is a deep
process of aligning the person, the project, and the vision, synergizing
it all, and getting it to work at the organizational and financial level.
It's hard work.
One aspect is that the individuals who are leading projects are very
much in the old paradigm of scarcity: "There's not enough to go around."
They fear cooperation either at the ego level ("I'll have my work
diminished"),
or at a financial level ("There's not enough money for everybody"),
or at the level of external recognition ("Who's going to get the
credit?"),
and so on. With the Gaia Leadership Project, I'm bringing together leaders
and looking at these issues straight on, with an open heart - acknowledging
the challenges, the difficulties, the ego issues, and working on them. Part
of the work is building enough trust to tackle them.
So that's one of the bigger issues. If there can be some kind of an alignment
- and that's not a given - then I think we'll have enough force and power
to influence the media, which is very receptive to any kind of initiative
right now, and to be a force for change.
Please support
this web site ... and thanks if you already are!
All contents copyright (c)1989,
1997 by Context Institute
Please send comments to webmaster
Last Updated 29 June 2000.
URL: http://www.context.org/ICLIB/IC22/Gershon.htm
Home | Search
| Index of Issues | Table
of Contents
|