Group Evolution
The normal stages in group development
by Bruce Dearborn
One of the articles in Strategies For Cultural Change (IC#9) Spring 1985, Page 23
Copyright (c)1985, 1997 by Context Institute
| To order this issue ...
Being part of a growing group is much more fun when you know what
to expect.
Bruce Dearborn has entrepreneured several small businesses and is
now the coordinator for the Earthbank Association. He lives in Clinton,
Washington.
PROCESSES IN GROUPS have been observed for years and while each group
has its unique aspects, most groups move (at least part way) through a
fairly predictable pattern of behaviors. The full progression consists
of:
- A "getting to know you" phase involving social interaction
and personal sharing - interaction that is polite and which involves small
degrees of risk.
- A "why are we here?" phase during which the group collectively
sorts out what the purpose of the group will be. In order to get clear
on that purpose, the whole group must move through some portion, at least,
of everyone's "agenda" (the conscious and public reasons they
are in the group). Likewise, portions of people's "hidden agendas"
(the often unconscious, or at least not admitted, emotional needs that
the person hopes the group can meet) will begin to reveal themselves. Depending
on the amount of charge people have around their need to have their agenda
be also the group's agenda, there will be some risk-taking which will move
people on to the next level of -
- A "bid for power" phase where members of the group may vie
with one another for control or influence over the group's direction. The
power struggles may be obvious, or they may simply be evident in body posture,
voice quality, levels of abstraction used in communication, or such things
as interruption during speaking. It is during this phase that the group
decides how it will function, how decisions will be made, what the roles
of leadership will be, and what the expectations are for participating
members.
- A "development" phase characterized by increased cooperation
and productivity. The group members have gotten to know each other, they
know why they are here, the competitiveness for power and authority has
diminished, and people are gaining experience in working with one another.
They will begin to identify with each other, respond more openly and positively
to each other's feedback, and will have a strong sense of group identity.
If this phase is successfully established, it may lead to yet another level
of -
- A "synergy" phase characterized by a deep sense of teamwork,
of easy yet powerful cooperation, and by feelings of closeness, elation,
and genuine mutual caring.
Of course, not all groups get to synergy, and even those that do may
go through a lot of stumbling along the way. What can be done to make the
progression through these phases smoother? The essential keys are, be aware
and take it easy:
Take time as a group to observe your own process and educate yourselves
about group process. Much of the anxiety in group development comes
from simply not knowing what to expect. For example, the progression from
the pleasant "getting to know you" phase to the more challenging
"bid for power" phase may seem to indicate that your group is
"falling apart," while in fact these are necessary, healthy parts
of building the cohesion of the group.
Keep a balance between "task" and "process." It
is normal for some group members to be more concerned about "getting
the job done" while others are more concerned with "how we relate
to each other." In fact, every group must deal with both of these.
By acknowledging and taking time for both, you can turn the group's diversity
of interests into an asset, instead of a focus of struggle.
Be focused but not impatient; don't try to suppress stages. Having
a "map" of the group's journey does not eliminate the need to
actually travel through each phase. It just makes the journey less bewildering.
Phases that are either rushed or skipped usually pop up later, often at
times when they have more far-reaching consequences than if they were dealt
with fully at the proper time.
Don't be surprised by membership turnover as the group moves from
one phase to another. Turnover is not necessarily a sign of failure,
for the needs of each member aren't always the same as the needs of the
group as it goes through its full evolution. Don't hobble the group's development
by assuming that your caring for each other as persons requires that the
group must either "work for everybody" or fall apart.
Trust the process. It is healthy to have a vision and a sense
of purpose, but don't be surprised if the detailed evolution of the group
is not what you initially expected. For example, a group initially formed
for a specific task may get deeply into the "getting to know you"
phase and then emerge as a whole cluster of distinct but related small task
groups.
Creating and being part of a synergic group does take time and work, but
the experience and the results are deeply satisfying - and easier than you
might expect.
Please support
this web site ... and thanks if you already are!
All contents copyright (c)1985,
1997 by Context Institute | To order this issue
...
Please send comments to webmaster
Last Updated 29 June 2000.
URL: http://www.context.org/ICLIB/IC09/Dearborn.htm
Home | Search
| Index of Issues | Table
of Contents
|