Psychotronic Farming
A controversial technique
is having a growing impact in the farm community
An Interview With Peter Kelly, by Leslie Aickin
One of the articles in Living With The Land (IC#8) Winter 1984, Page 55
Copyright (c)1985, 1997 by Context Institute
MOST OF THE ARTICLES in this section have been built around
the idea that we can have better land use by following the patterns
of biological nature. This is an important, even crucial, concept,
but in our enthusiasm for it we run the danger of forgetting that
there is more to nature than just biology and ecology - indeed
there may be whole vast facets of nature to which we are mostly
blind. If we look at other cultures, we find that many of them
- including the Chinese, the Egyptians, and the neolithic Europeans
- were greatly concerned about "energy paths" and "power
points" in the earth about which our culture knows essentially
nothing. We used to brush these old ideas aside as mere superstition,
but we may now slowly be learning a lesson from Chinese medicine.
Traditional Chinese medicine also spoke of mysterious "energy
meridians" and "pressure points" that did not correspond
to any aspect of physical anatomy known to Western medicine. At
first medical doctors thought it was all nonsense, but then they
began to see consistent successful results from acupuncture and
acupressure. As a culture, we have had to admit that, even though
we don't thoroughly understand it, these aspects of Chinese medicine
are dealing with something real.
The earth energies so important to these old cultures may
be a similar phenomenon, but in this case for the body of the
earth. The evidence is slimmer, but the parallels are very suggestive.
What offends the traditional Western scientific mind about all
this, however, is that detecting these energies requires trained
humans, not just mechanical instruments. The ancient Chinese science
of these earth energies, known as Feng-Shui (literally
"wind and water"), used a combination of naturalistic
observations, instruments such as their geomantic compass, and
personal sensitivity to detect these subtle energies. The results
obtained from these techniques were used to place buildings, vegetation,
roads, etc. in positions that would harmonize most positively
with the observed energy patterns.
The subject of the following interview deals with a similar
case of a technique that mixes instrumentation and human sensitivity
and claims to detect and affect subtle energies that are not normally
recognized by Western science. Because of this blend of mind and
electronics it is now known as "psychotronics," although
when it first developed it was called "radionics." It
got started many decades ago when some inventors were attempting
to use certain circuits to analyze mineral specimens, but found
that their readings were influenced by nearby plants and people.
They changed direction, and have steadily explored the interaction
between their equipment and the living world around them.
The validity of all this is definitely controversial, and
my intention in including this material is not to "sell"
you on the idea of psychotronics, one way or the other, but simply
to explore beyond the edges of the comfortably known and remind
ourselves that the land may hold mysteries beyond anything we
have yet imagined.
Peter Kelly, an electronics engineer turned inventor and
teacher, is the director of Interdimensional Sciences (PO Box
167, Lakemont, GA 30552) and first vice-president of the U.S.
Psychotronics Association (3459 West Montrose Ave, Chicago, IL
60618). Leslie Aickin lives in Port Townsend, WA, and is a personal
friend of Peter.
Leslie: How does psychotronics work?
Peter: It is really very simple, if you first understand
what modern physics has discovered: Everything in this universe
seems to be patterns of energy at its primary level, and it is
these patterns of energy crossing and recrossing their nodal points
and their resonant points that make the physical universe, or
seem to. They create a holographic pattern which is the physical
substance itself. Psychotronics is a way of tuning into these
patterns of energy - these nodal points of crossing or points
of resonance, whatever you want to call them.
Leslie: How do you do that tuning, what equipment
do you use?
Peter: Our tuners are rectangular boxes, about 2 feet
long, by 1.5 feet high by 1 foot deep, filled with various electronic
components, and functioning somewhat like a bridge circuit in
ordinary electronics. As you may know, a bridge circuit has three
known sides plus a fourth side that can be filled by an unknown
component to be tested. In a similar way, a psychotropic tuner
detects the energy fields around whatever you put into it.
Leslie: Where do you put the specimen that you are
working with?
Peter: Into an input well. You then turn the dials connected
to the variable capacitors, and (here's where it gets a little
tricky) you have to rub an acrylic plate at the same time until
your fingers stick to the plate. The operator has to be trained
to do this successfully.
Leslie: So the operator winds up being part of the
whole circuit?
Peter: Normally. We've had some success with a system
that does away with the operator, but it's still in the experimental
stages.
Leslie: What then do you do with these techniques?
Peter: When you can tune into something and attune
to an aspect of it, then its possible to modify its patterns of
energy, and thus to affect the physical substance that is based
on these patterns. For example, if you have a pattern that corresponds
to a e coli bacteria and you were to transpose this pattern
electronically and feed it back 90 degrees out of phase, in theory,
you would see that the two opposite wave forms should cancel out,
which would mean that the e coli would be cancelled out,
and that is what we find to be the case in working with primitive
organisms. Particularly in agriculture, things in their larval
stage, or their simpler stages, are most amenable to cancellation
or elimination.
Leslie: On the physical plane would you be observing
dying?
Peter: Not dying, disappearing.
Leslie: So you wouldn't have a remnant form or body?
Peter: No, not in the very simple organisms. In a more
complex one, you would have some remnants, but in the simple ones
they just go back to their native materials, like water and basic
energy. I know in research that has been done in, for example,
corn borers, the corn borers literally dissolve in the ear of
corn itself. You see the path leading down into where they were
and just a wet smear, and that is all that is left of them, to
be reabsorbed by the corn.
That is where psychotronics has come from. The direction
it is going to is completely different. We've started
taking to heart a lot of what Dr. Phillip Challahan has been saying.
He is an entomologist with the USDA out of Gainsville FL, and
author of the books Tuning In To Nature, Soul Of The Ghost
Moth, and Ancient Mysteries, Modern Visions. In his
books he shows that the structure of the insects themselves make
them receptors for microwave level radiation or near infrared
- very high microwave - and that the signal that comes off of,
say, a field of unhealthy corn broadcasts to these insects and
attracts them. So our approach nowadays, rather than trying to
kill anything (since everything has its place in nature somewhere,
even the insects in cleaning up diseased corn or unbalanced crops),
would be to raise the vitality of the plant, raise the vitality
of the field, so that the insects are no longer attracted to them
in the first place.
Leslie: In addition to no longer attracting damaging
insects, does healthy corn also attract helpful organisms?
Peter: Absolutely. In connection with this we could
go in a number of different directions, but let's start with the
soil. Over the years, the soils in most fields have become literally
a witch's brew of chemicals in various levels. First, they have
put on mineral type fertilizers that tend to make the soil more
full of salt every year, which means less conducive to life. Second,
they have been using herbicides and pesticides to try to eliminate
the problems that their unhealthy soil has caused.
We take that soil and in enough instances have demonstrated
that first, we can neutralize these various chemicals that have
been placed on these fields over many years. Second, we can clean
out any imbalances in the fields that existed in the first place.
Then we match the soil to any of a number of varieties of seeds.
In effect, what we're saying is, "OK, you seeds, which of
you can grow best in this type of soil?"
Leslie: You use a psychotronics device in order to
determine this?
Peter: Oh yes, and find out what nutrients are available
in the field, and then comparing it to what the plant would need
through to its full production as a crop. Then we can potentize
or add energy of the seed back to the seed. Now that seems
strange unless you can remember that because everything is patterns
of energy, if we take the pattern of energy off of a seed, then
we can replicate that pattern of energy and cast it back to the
same seed. Next we take the fertilizer that shows best suited
to the seed and the soil, and take out any factors that show to
be detrimental to either the seed or the soil. Before we apply
the fertilizer, after we have cleaned it out and balanced it,
we can potentize it, which means that if before you needed a ton
per acre, now you only need 200 pounds per acre. And then we can
find out what the seed and later the plant is going to need all
the way until it is harvested as far as additional minerals or
nutrients or whatever.
Leslie: So you can set up a program to encourage
maximum health for the plant throughout its whole cycle?
Peter: Right through to harvest. What we are trying
to do is to take the very inexact science of agriculture and make
it a more exact science so that a farmer doesn't have to spend
as much to produce, and yet what he does produce is very high
in quality. To give you an example, one of our farmers last year
had a total planting cost per acre for corn of $29/acre, compared
to a national average of about $120/acre.
He's taking his own manure, turning it into compost, and balancing
it and potentizing it using his psychotropic techniques. He is
getting equivalent yields to anyone in his neighborhood, yet spending
only 1/4 what they are. His product doesn't mold, doesn't spoil,
has very high sugar readings because of the way he is producing
it. We have other farmers who have sugar (Brix) readings on their
alfalfa hay that are astounding, up around 30% sugar range, which
is unheard of. Having such a high quality, such a high natural
sugar level, the stuff doesn't spoil.
Leslie: So storage becomes an easier function as
well?
Peter: Absolutely. The way it's been done in the past
is that the old salesman comes up to the farm and says, "Well,
how many acres you going to do in corn this year?" And the
farmer says, "Well, I'm going to do 200 acres in corn."
And the guy says, "You are going to need X tons of fertilizer,
when do you want it, and how are you going to pay for it?"
And he just takes what they bring him.
Leslie: Which is a very low labor approach in one
way of looking at it, not in the long term, but in the sort term.
Do you find that farmers using your type of fertilizing program
put more labor into the care of their fields, as opposed to more
money?
Peter: There is a balance struck. For example, it doesn't
take much thinking to realize that if you are spending $29 or
$30 per acre as opposed to $120 per acre, somewhere in there is
a $90 per acre premium that you are going to get, and you can
afford to spend a little bit more time in doing your own composting.
Leslie: How would you characterize the people who
seem to be attracted to using psychotronics as an alternative
to conventional methods?
Peter: The ones that are at the bitter end, one step
away from bankruptcy.
Leslie: They have one more crop to make it or break
it?
Peter: That's right. And once they have turned things
around and at least break even for that year, once they see how
what we're doing is cost effective, then they're sold for life.
Now some of the farmers that we've trained have taken the better
part of a year to get their land clear, to get their animals cleaned
out, to get the cows so that they don't have chronic mastitis,
or whatever. But if they stick with it, they get results. For
example, there are all sorts of tests they do on milk and on dairy
herds in most states. Typical is what they call a somatic cell
count of the milk. Up to something like a million cells is relatively
safe. We have farmers now that (without putting any antibiotics
in their feed like most others do) are getting somatic cell counts
under 100!
They also don't have a lot of abortion taking place in the
cows, which has been a big problem for a lot of farmers. These
guys clean and balance their feed and water, and also work on
their crops. So something is happening, it's real, and it's affecting
their bottom line where everything is affected in the end.
Leslie: What kind of time commitment does your training
take?
Peter: My best answer is as much time as they have to
spare.
Leslie: This is for basic training in how to use
psychotronics equipment and becoming familiar with their fields
and that sort of thing?
Peter: Yes, and then the big thing of course is taking
it home and using it. Those that do are becoming very successful.
Those that put it on the side or just say well, you know, maybe
this isn't what I thought it should be, end up without any real
gain. It is not something you can do a little of, you have to
make a commitment to work on these things, as we teach, and if
they do, then we virtually guarantee they will have changes in
their operation. We haven't lost a farmer yet, once they got hold
of what we're doing, which is pretty remarkable when you consider
the rate of farm bankruptcies in recent years.
Leslie: How do these farmers hear about psychotronics
in the first place?
Peter: Everything has been word of mouth so far. One
guy telling his neighbor who tells his neighbor who tells a relative
in another state and they are curious, or they have a friend that's
curious, and they have heard of it or something. We have as yet
to advertise anything we've ever done and yet, between the personal
classes and the agricultural classes, we've trained over 2000
people in five years.
Leslie: That's a substantial number of farmers, Peter.
Peter: Yes, and it's going up exponentially, too.
Leslie: How widespread is psychotropic farming? Where
do the people come from?
Peter: I've had people from Hawaii, Maine, California,
Washington State, Idaho, just about every state in the U.S.. I've
got apple orchards in Connecticut and Vermont, dairy farmers in
New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Iowa, Wisconsin. All through the
farm belt, everywhere. As a matter of fact, I can't think of a
single state where I haven't trained at least one person so far,
plus many from other countries also.
Leslie: Do you find that the people who are using
psychotronics with farming come from any particular age group
or educational background?
Peter: No, we've had them from 18 years old to the late
70s in the classes we've taught. In fact we've had one elderly
couple from western Virginia that have a goat farm. We also get
people from many different religious and philosophical backgrounds.
In addition to all the usual denominations, we've had Amish, Mennonites,
and others of the "plain people," as they call themselves.
Leslie: So the people who are using it, then, are
not necessarily people who are already predisposed to alternative
solutions?
Peter: Exactly. For some of them, that's the farthest
thing from their minds. We feel very comfortable about that because
we're creating a level of awareness that is affecting the whole
nation, not just a specialized group of freethinkers.
Leslie: How does what you are doing with psychotropic
farming relate to approaches like biological agriculture and permaculture?
Peter: It adds a whole other dimension and puts you
5 years ahead right away because you can absolutely see the relationships
between your land and anything you put on it or do with it. In
our training, what we stress, more than any other thing, more
than the actual treating of the land, is the capability to know
exactly where your land is at - the absolute ability to diagnose.
Leslie: Could the techniques you are developing be
used as a technological fix that would still leave some important
attitude questions about the land unaddressed?
Peter: I won't claim that these techniques can't be
misused, but all our material is set up to teach a person to go
for a cause behind a cause behind a cause. For example, at one
time the farm family was thought of as the healthiest segment
of the population, with all that fresh air, good hard work, and
good basic food. But now because of all the chemicals they are
using, the farm community is full of stories of heart attacks
and early cancers in 20 and 30 year olds and a birth defect level
higher than the national average.
So our first emphasis for these folks is for them to get themselves
cleaned and balanced, and attitudes are an essential part
of this. Once they have done this, then they can do the same thing
to everything around them, their animals and then their land.
To make it work, you have to deal with the whole system.
Geomancy
by William Prescott
Twilight and lunar seed
for seeing
the earth's intelligent capillaries
or feel it your hand
passing through the etheric
vessel of earth's blood
a tug
like a fish on the line
for harmony
placement is vital
in human stance or human structure
careful articulations
requiring sight as well as insight
or consider the shaman's secret:
to stand beside a vortex
- not too close to the grassy swirl
and extend the fibers out
to feed as earth is fed.
This the old way
I know another possibility
beyond placement beyond nourishment
in a world of true knowledge
where the art of knowing earth's life
is intimate constant as love
closer than weather where we stand
finally embracing
with fibers of light
each stream and river of the planet's bright blood
so that the earth is reborn
and what was once only sensed dimly
in the heart's eye
is alive arising awake
Please support
this web site ... and thanks if you already are!
All contents copyright (c)1985, 1997 by Context Institute
Please send comments to webmaster
Last Updated 29 June 2000.
Home | Search
| Index of Issues | Table of Contents
|